Hey, Gavin Newsom Did You Know That The AR-15 Not An Assault Rifle?
Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.
Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people.
English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops)
only when needed to fight foreign adversaries.
For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies.
the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.
The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense.
The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.
>This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution.
The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii/interpretations/99
No self-respecting gun owner would ever call his AR-15 an assault rifle, but many who’ve never done their research think the “AR” in “AR-15” stands for “Assault Rifle.”
In reality, the initials stand for “Armalite Rifle,” and this modern sporting rifle is just as deadly as a Ruger Mini-14. Both are rifles sharing the same .223/5.56x45mm caliber and both accept 30 round box magazines.
They even have a comparable muzzle velocity of ~3,000 fps and, most importantly, a rate of fire of one per trigger pull.
The most obvious difference between the two rifles lies in their appearance.The Mini-14 has an unassuming wooden stock that wouldn’t make it look out of place hanging over someone’s fireplace, while the black polymer.
AR-15 has rails and an extended stock which make it look “scary” to anti-gun folks.What these people don’t realize is that those “scary” features have nothing to do with making the gun more effective at killing. They exist for better ergonomics and modularity and not much else.
Firefield’s rails and laser lights, for example, are seen by these same anti-gun people as being unnecessarily militaristic. There’s something intimidating about aggressive looking edges and the color black which gives sensitive people a sense of unease.
It seems because of people like this, the federal government, in all its wisdom, defines an “assault weapon” as a semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable box magazine capable of holding more than fifteen rounds and has a pistol grip and/or a forward grip.
Other cosmetic features such as folding stocks, barrel shrouds, threaded barrels or attached grenade launchers also constitute an “assault weapon.”
Once again, none of these things make the AR-15 more dangerous then its wooden Ruger counterpart.
In essence, the “assault weapon” label is a product of political thought. The term is only used by people who hate guns and want to ban them, so in a practical sense, outside of law, an “assault weapon” doesn’t really exist.
What about an “assault rifle?” Does the AR-15 fall under this blanket term? While it has a distant relationship to the “assault weapon,” the term “assault rifle” is used in a lot of popular media like movies and video games so it has a more neutral connotation than the very anti-gun “assault weapon.”
The etymology of the word first came from the StG-44, the very first “assault rifle.”
This German rifle’s designation stands for Sturmgewehr Vierundvierzig. Literally “Assault (sturm) rifle (gewehr) model of forty-four.” Named by Hitler himself, this rifle used an intermediate 7.92x33mm cartridge, smaller than the full-sized 8mm round used by the K98 Mauser. It also featured a select fire feature, enabling users to switch from semi-automatic fire to fully automatic fire with the flip of a switch.
To many modern firearm users, these two features – a rifle’s select-fire capability and its use of an intermediate cartridge, define an “assault rifle.” The AR-15, however, lacks a functional select-fire feature.
By design, the AR-15 is a semi-automatic civilian sporting rifle.
a completely different animal from the M4 the military uses, which is a select-fire service carbine.
In very simple terms – the AR-15 is just a semi-automatic rifle.
No one should be calling it an assault weapon because it’s a made-up political term, and it can neither be called an assault rifle because of its lack of a select-fire mechanism.
The vast array of Firefield’s optics, whether they be riflescopes like the Barrage 1.5 - 5x32 or red dots sights like the Impulse 1x28, are compatible with any modern sporting rifle with rails, whether they be AR-15s or Mini-14s.
https://firefield.com/blogs/news/why-is-the-ar-15-not-an-assault-rifle
Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people.
English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops)
only when needed to fight foreign adversaries.
For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies.
the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.
The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense.
The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.
>This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution.
Comments
Post a Comment